Who can change a business's published facts
By Jason MurphyPublished 3 min read
By Jason MurphyPublished 3 min read
The short answer
A company's published facts can be changed by parties other than the company: the public through suggested edits, platforms through automated updates, aggregators through feeds and partners through their own systems. Detecting a change requires a record of what each fact should be, who confirmed it and when.
Control over a fact is not the same as ownership of it. For a typical company the set of parties able to change what is published includes:
Most overwrites are not malicious. A platform reconciles two sources and picks one. A feed refreshes with data that was correct a year ago. A well-meaning visitor corrects a department's hours from memory. The effect is the same: a published fact changes without anyone at the company deciding to change it, and nothing notifies them.
The change is usually found by accident, through a customer, a missed call, or a wrong answer from an assistant. By then the old value may already have been copied elsewhere.
A change can only be seen as a change if the company has a record of what the fact is supposed to be. The record states each value, where it came from, who confirmed it and when. A scheduled comparison reads each public copy and reports the ones that differ.
Without the record, the company is reduced to checking whether a listing looks right, which cannot detect a plausible wrong value.
The record also settles a question every party eventually raises: who is allowed to change which fact. The company may be the authority for its hours and its services. The manufacturer is authoritative for what it authorizes the company to sell. The distributor is authoritative for the account and territory. An edit by the wrong party to a fact is an error even when it is accurate on the day.
That record is the foundation described in Business Truth.
Not entirely. Claimed profiles reduce some changes, but platforms, aggregators and partners still write to copies. Detection against a known record is the dependable control.
Usually by accident. A scheduled comparison of each public copy against the record makes it routine instead.
It is still a change made outside the owner's process. It should be confirmed and recorded, or reversed, so the record and the public copies agree.
Named current staff, with former employees and former agencies removed. Access is part of the record.
Labs · Research
Research report
Labs · Research
One physical location, three identities. Machines count them as three businesses.
Dealer and channel data3 min read
One dealer is described in six places. No directory is the record, and a correction in one does not travel to the others.
Dealer and channel data4 min read
Every wrong answer came from somewhere. The work is finding the copy that was wrong first.
What AI says and why3 min read
The question is not whether the tool is safe. It is which facts are cleared to leave the building.
What AI says and why3 min read
A connector gives an assistant a front door to a catalog. It also asks which party's catalog is the answer.
What AI says and why3 min read
One email a week: what we asked the AI, what it got wrong, and how we checked.
Our research reaches 17,000+ followers across our channels. Upstream is the weekly version.
Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy